Skip to main content
Now Accepting New Patients — Virtual consultations available from anywhere in the world. Request Consultation →
← Back to Journal
Contouring · Guide

Buccal Fat Removal:
Who Is and Isn’t a Good Candidate

By Dr. Carl Truesdale, MD · Beverly Hills · 5 min read

Buccal fat removal (bichectomy) became one of the most discussed facial procedures in recent years — and simultaneously one of the most cautionary tales in aesthetic surgery. The procedure is effective and appropriate for a specific patient profile. In the wrong candidate, it produces premature facial aging that is difficult to correct.

What Buccal Fat Is

The buccal fat pad is a discrete fat compartment located in the lower cheek, between the buccinator muscle and the overlying facial muscles. It contributes to the rounded, full-cheeked appearance of the lower face. Unlike subcutaneous facial fat, it does not significantly change with weight fluctuation — it is a structural compartment rather than a metabolically active fat store. Its removal is intended to reduce lower cheek fullness and improve the appearance of the lateral cheek definition.

The Ideal Candidate

The ideal buccal fat removal candidate has a genuinely full lower face that is structural rather than weight-related, has good overlying skin tone, is in their 20s or 30s, and has a face shape that would benefit from lateral cheek definition. If you already have good cheekbone definition and a normal lower face, removing buccal fat will hollow the cheeks rather than define them. Evaluation must be performed with the face at rest and in motion — not based on aspirational reference photos.

“The most common buccal fat removal complication I see is that it was performed on the wrong patient. In a face that ages naturally, removing this fat accelerates the hollow appearance of older age.”

The Long-Term Concern

Facial fat decreases naturally with age. The buccal fat pad contributes to maintaining lower face volume as the face ages. Patients who have it removed in their late twenties may find that by their forties, they have a dramatically hollowed, skeletonized appearance that cannot be corrected without fat grafting or filler. This long-term trajectory must be part of the candidacy conversation.

What Dr. Truesdale Recommends

Dr. Truesdale is selective about buccal fat removal and declines to perform it in patients who are not appropriate candidates regardless of their desire for the procedure. For patients who are genuinely appropriate candidates, the results can be excellent. For patients with borderline anatomy, alternatives such as strategic BOTOX for masseter reduction or targeted contouring with fillers are often preferable options.

The right candidate matters more than the right technique.

Dr. Truesdale performs honest candidacy evaluations before recommending any contouring procedure.